When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment
16 January 2025
When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment
SCENARIOS IN WHICH DOACs HAVE DEMONSTRABLE EFFICACY AND SAFETY
stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF)
atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes or recent percutaneous coronary intervention(the ideal regimen for stable patients who have undergone percutaneous intervention or had a recent acute coronary syndrome and have atrial fibrillation is a DOAC with a single antiplatelet agent, preferably a P2Y12 inhibitor, for which clopidogrel is typically chosen)
In patients with atrial fibrillation with many types of valvular heart disease, DOACs are currently recommended
For patients with VTE, guidelines recommend the use of DOACs for acute management,including for cancer-associated thrombosis, as well as extendedduration secondary prevention of VTE
In patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or after recent peripheral artery revascularization, low-intensity rivaroxaban was shown to play a role in the reduction of cardiovascular events in combination with aspirin.
SCENARIOS WHERE DOACs ARE LESS EFFICACIOUS OR SAFE, OR PROVIDE NO BENEFIT COMPARED WITH STANDARD OF CARE
Mechanical heart valves
Rheumatic atrial fibrillation
THROMBOTIC ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME
TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT.
EMBOLIC STROKE OF UNDETERMINED SOURCE
LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION WITHOUT AF
SCENARIOS WHERE THE SAFETY/EFFICACY OF DOACs IS UNCERTAIN
Catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis
Splanchnic vein thrombosis
UNCERTAIN INDICATIONS. Left ventricular thrombus
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
SUBGROUPS WITH UNCERTAIN EVIDENCE. End-stage renal disease